..
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbcardzman
I am not really into graded cards much so I don't know much about it, but are there special considerations given to older cards regarding the grading scale? Why do I see cards graded EX with a crease in them? I thought that EX meant no creases. And when you get to Poor and Fair grades, it's just a toss up. And it isn't just the oddball grading companies, because I see a lot in PSA holders also. Are these some of the first graded cards ever done? Are the people who grade them getting tired from grading so many? Or are they getting too old to see anymore? Any ideas?
|
I think PSA could fall under Odball as well as much as they're looked at as the "head-honchos" of grading (by some) I think it's a toss up with them. You can get the oddest of grades from that company.
SGC IMO is the best and far more consistent.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%
237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW
Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!
Checklists sold (20)
T205 8/208 3.8%
|