View Single Post
  #3  
Old 05-29-2015, 05:28 PM
Cozumeleno Cozumeleno is offline
An$on
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartyFromCANADA View Post
Has anyone else had a problem like this?
I have not, but it kind of underscores my thoughts on the grading industry as a whole.

I should admit, when I'm buying a high-dollar card, I prefer that it's either graded or in bad shape so I'm not spending a ton of money on it. I like the security of the holder. But, really, stuff like this just proves how subjective grading is as a whole. And it's not even the graders' faults, to be honest. One person can have an entirely different view looking at the same exact card. Someone may be having a bad day. The list goes on and on, really.

And who's to say that grading companies are always going to be 100% honest, anyway?

I'm not bold enough to say the grading industry is going to be in the can in five years, ten, or even 15. But the thing is that too often the number on the holsters is taken as gospel when, at the end of the day, it's no more than someone's opinion.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (16/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (37/50)

Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225

www.prewarcollector.com
Reply With Quote