Thanks for chiming in here. You claim to like my "12 theory". And, I posted (in Post # 58) an analysis of the T206 Series structures that supports this theory.
Therefore, I have this question for you, instead of being critical of me, why aren't you criticizing Pat for making the following remark ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R
Ted,
..... but that's just my opinion and your 12 factor is no different. It's a number that only fits in a few places without forcing it to fit.
Patrick
|
Darn it, the 12 factor fits into every Series of the T206 structure....these numbers don't lie. Therefore, it is Pat who making the "ridiculing" remark.
TED Z
.