Quote:
Originally Posted by Jantz
Scott
In no way do I think this is a fake. Not on the same level as a scrap though. Just my opinion. Without a doubt, a cool card!
Er!ck
Wiltse could possibly be positioned on the edge of the sheet and that's why there is no red ink from the adjacent card. I'm sure you already thought of that. 
I don't think that SGC mucked up the flip. It was explained to me by SGC that they only have so much space to work with on the third line of the flip. So I figure it was either "Both Ears Show" or "Ghost Image".
If whoever submitted this card did not specify "Ghost Image" on the submission form then SGC labeled it as if it was a regular T206.
I had a T206 once with two distinct features. SGC would only let me choose one for the third line. |
Jantz - I thought you were around when I submitted it? I took it over at the National and they said they would put 'Ghost image' on it. Then I waited...and waited...and waited. Finally they told me they would not put anything on it. I argued and argued and argued. They were adamant.
So it comes back with 'both ears' ?!? How could that be valid, when both ears show on BOTH portraits? They used the T205 descriptor. Morons, but the best in the business
