View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-15-2014, 03:50 AM
sschauer sschauer is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 83
Default

I believe you are correct as the Rose I have never seen and I've looked for a long time. I was surprised to find both variations the 1978 triples 33 or 3 in unopened form so that shows 1st printing / 2nd printing if you can verify that in the mail in set it doesnt have the other supposed variation I can sleep well.

Reply With Quote