Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
...since all thoughts are welcome. Let's assume the best - you are honest, your wife is honest. Unfortunately, with those assumptions, that means that your wife's grandfather is the blatant liar in the story. Let's go with that.
|
No need to lie about anything. He had to get the ball from somewhere during that time. I took the ball to antiques roadshow in Austin this past summer and the lady who looked at it also did not think that it was a real signature, but she was certain that the ink on the signature was from that time period (30's) She just told me that she is not an authenticator, but the signature did not look like a real ruth signature (which I agreed).