Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Yep. You could let in 25 or more players on the ground that they were better, as good or very nearly as good as someone already in, and then you would have to let 100 more in by the same logic. It never would end.
|
The discussion deffinatly needs to be done with what is considered the minimum. If a guy is middle of the pack of HOFers and better than player that most would discredit then you have a case. For instance you can't ever compare a new guy to Schalk, L. Waner, Mazeroski or high pockets Kelly. Even some less debatable players may not make comparable like Brock who was mainly in for being a stat leader.