Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddy
Just strange that the defects in the 2.5 card are all hard to see in the scans, in the shadows, or only visible in person, while the dog ears on the corners of the 4 are clearly visible from any and all photos/scans/artist's renderings, etc.
I guess I need to get better educated with the grading rules.
|
They are both also scanned using completely different settings. Look how much brighter and washed out the 2.5 looks. Surface image has been descreened and flattened.
Personally I'd rather have the dog ears, then surface wrinkles on a card, but I may be in the minority.