View Single Post
  #5  
Old 08-20-2014, 09:04 AM
tedzan tedzan is offline
Ted Zanidakis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania & Maine
Posts: 10,053
Default Hey Erick

Quote:
Originally Posted by t206hound View Post
Chris' assertion was based on Piedmont backs... not Hindu backs.

I used the terms "Hindu" and "Non-Hindu" just to separate the group of 34 from the group of 14. The question at hand relates just to Piedmont 350 which is obviously a much larger sample size. With small sample sizes, resubmission of the same card can greatly affect these ratios.

Question edited:
If that were the case, then 16 cards (all 14 non-Hindu plus the two double-printed Hindu) would occur with twice the frequency of the remaining 32. Within the Hindu group, is there data to support that any of them appear at a 2-to-1 frequency in the Piedmont 350 printing to the non-Hindu group?

I'm guessing you missed (or ignored) my post (below) in response to Chris' post regarding PIEDMONT vs OLD MILL SL's.

Please read it, before you jump to any more conclusions regarding what I am saying (or thinking).



Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan View Post
In 2006, when I was working on my all-PIEDMONT set, among the last few cards I needed to complete it were a good number of the group of 34 - SL guys.

So, there you are....some empirical data to support your observation on this subject of PIEDMONT vs OLD MILL SL's.



TED Z

TED Z
Reply With Quote