Thread: What 1960's Set To Build?
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-26-2014, 09:31 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is online now
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 8,091
Default
1965 looks fantastic and the high numbers aren't problematic. As others have said, '61 and '67 are a nightmare due to the 'regular' high numbers and the high number HOF'ers. How about 1962? A very cool looking set that's attainable, too.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land
https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote