Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
I will be seeing and chatting with them at the National. Maybe I can persuade them (but don't hold your breath  ) ....it really is a good suggestion. |
I had this same discussion with them about five years ago, and they assured me they would be addressing the issue. Assuming they did address it, I guess they decided to leave things just the way they are. It's bad enough that a gem photo gets a low grade because of a little paper loss, I suppose one can just ignore the grade. But when a card with a nearly invisible photo gets a 6 or a 7 because it has sharp corners, that is simply inexcusable.