View Single Post
  #5  
Old 06-21-2014, 03:07 PM
RGold's Avatar
RGold RGold is offline
Ronald Goldberg
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Leawood, Kansas
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
I do get the insinuation, but I am basing my observation on the strictness of their grading on a couple of friends. Two of whom routinely sub hundreds of raw cards a month, and the other two have reviewed about fifty very high-end pieces this year. I have held a couple of those reviews in hand, and even an ex grader with a conservative eye whom we all speak to said past grading regimes would likely have bumped the strongest of those review candidates.
Not insinuating anything other than your logic seems faulty. Most everyone that submits cards for review believes the cards deserve a bump. If they do not bump that indicates to me PSA is grading the same.

I know three friends who submit to PSA hundreds of cards a month. They seem to think the grading standards are about the same. So I guess our anecdotal evidence is a tie.

To come to your conclusion, PSA would have to start downgrading many cards which we know they won't do.
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold
Reply With Quote