Greg, I suppose that on some level (perhaps subconsciously), a player's greatness enhances the overall appeal of their cards.
I will tell you one thing, though. Wally Moon could have put up Babe Ruth type numbers, and you still wouldn't have seen his cards in any "best looking" lists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregMitch34
Amazing how many of the picks for most beautiful are also among the greatest players which suggests....what? That the card makers put more time and talent into picturing the better players? Or we are all partly biased by the fame of the player? Take any one of the cards that usually make the "most gorgeous" list and pretend it's not a HOFer but, say, Art Devlin, as the player pictured and then imagine if you would still pick it #1 when there are so many others to choose from...just asking...
|
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps.
Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd.
|