Quote:
Originally Posted by sporteq
Oh Scott- enough with the twisted circus exaggerated comments. We all know net54 is your playground hence the 6k posts. Let me clear up the facts here. All the refunds? It was on two photos that look exactly like the 1927 Waner brothers photo you bought and sold. I wasn't duped.. I got A refund. An "EXPERT" no comment LMFAO
AGAIN, this is about the "PHOTO" not an attack on you, Scott. If your taking this personal, that's your problem not mine. This discussion is not me vs you (Scott) It's a simple discussion on a photo.
|
Do you really want me to post the 'age criteria' that you sent me via ebay? Or the comment that referred to what I paid for it and what I was charging;i.e - perhaps a hint of jealousy that I had gotten a good buy and, as dealers do, was going to make a profit?
When you got foolish via ebay, I basically ignored you and you kept coming at me, so if it wasn't personal at that point, I don't know what your definition of "personal" is. When you suggested that to test to see if my photo was vintage, I should bend it and see if it cracked or 'greased' (I assume you meant 'creased'), I wrote you off as a loony and moved on. Good luck bending all of your photos - I hope they all crack so you can be sure you made a smart purchase.
In any case, I have no more time for your nonsense. If we ever meet, show me your i.d. to prove you are over 21 and I'll buy you a beer.
Edited to add: I could very well be wrong about this, and you might be right, but.... "
Sometimes... it's just the way you say things, Travis. That's all. I swear to God." - Jim Bowie from 'The Alamo' 2004
Myguyty: I took this to heart, but it took a while for it to stick. I'm trying, I promise