Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim65
I have done research. Ruben was convicted twice and set free by a judge who didn't even say he was innocent. The problem with this case has always been that people base their opinions on his book and later on the movie, on which Ruben was a consultant. His book and the movie are full of fabricatiions and outright lies. Why does he need to lie if he ws innocent?
|
+1
Great point about fabrications and lies. As I've learned many years ago...a lie has many versions, while the truth only has one.