Quote:
Originally Posted by Duluth Eskimo
I understand that most people would prefer a vintage photo signed in ink. With that being said, how much less would you say a nicely signed photo (non glossy) in pencil would be for a top pre-war star? I was thinking about 30%. How far off am I or give me some feedback? Thanks, Jason
|
I don't think there's a hard and fast rule. Depends on the player, the quality if the autograph, etc.