04-07-2014, 04:53 PM
|
 |
pete ullman
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,501
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by npa589
There did look like there was some peeling, but, as many know on this board, it is a known error/variation - though not recognized. It would be the "Murr'y" error variation if it checks out. Personally, I think it is an example of the variation, and that there actually isnt any paper loss on the front - and that it just appeared like it in the scan, but could of course be wrong. Regardless, I bid on it high as well, with the safety that he said it was "creaseless", yet had 3 creases.
|
I agree...I think it's legit.
|