Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
You list several different examples there and I think each would be treated differently. I think it would be taboo to clean game-used memoribilia - bats, glove, balls. Those are expected to show signs of game-use.
I think it would be okay to restore a stadium seat, but that's just my opinion. If it's something you're going to display in your home, some may want to restore it, some may want to keep is as it was. I think that's just a matter of personal preference.
What about other types of memoribilia? I have some autographed mini-helmets (football and baseball), that reside on my bookshelves and they tend to get dust on them. I occasionally wipe them with down a damp cloth to remove the dust. I see nothing wrong wtih that.
|
Thanks for the reply David. Makes sense.
As far as wiping down your mini-helmets, that sounds reasonable. Now, if you were using Windex....
Side note, a Swifter may be better
Brian- I'm not sure on the Plank. There are many questions I would have-like, who sent it in to be cleaned, the consignor? The auction house? Combination of both? What was it cleaned with? Who cleaned it? Who submitted it? Was it disclosed (all information) to the winner? As far as the last question-if it were disclosed (all information) to the buyer, and he followed through, I guess the buyer would be ok with the card as is.
It's mind boggling that with such a high profile card that they would go to those extremes for a .5 bump!!
As far as value-of course varies, but I'm sure someone could look up what it sold for. I don't even know what auction house sold it.
It is clearly chemically altered, and an altered card should not have the numerical grade-in my opinion. The scans are the proof.
Sincerely, Clayton