Quote:
Originally Posted by KCRfan1
Do you also believe it is wrong to have works of art cleaned and restored?
I'm not picking an arguement with you, as I agree that full disclosure must be practiced.
|
Noble goal, but has anyone received full disclosure on any 100 year old card that they have purchased? Provenance when available is interesting and when available should be pursued, but I have never seen or heard of a card being promoted with a statement that indicates that the card was cracked out of a PSA slab in 2003 and resubmitted to SGC. Or that a card was sent to PSA seven times until it got the desired the grade. Or how that card may have been stored, handled or displayed for its first 90 years of existence.
Personally I have absolutely no knowledge of what happened to any of my cards in 1964, and in 2064 I doubt that any collectors (with the possible exception of wazoo) will know what a Dick Towle is, what it did or what it means.
Those who practice restoration (by any method) with an intent to deceive will not disclose. As I said, full disclosure is a noble goal, but perhaps a fantasy in the real world and all the pontification in the world will not change that.
Disclaimer: I agree with everyone who has posted in this thread
, and add this editorial comment without prejudice
, so don't try to pick a fight with me.
