Well, that definitely locks up the paper money in the piano scenario with the argument of statue of limitations.
A natural metal from the earth which was found in the ground?
Lol. No I don't really think they are much different, but it certainly adds to the irony.
That was judged in 1970?
I do believe that he argued the wrong thing though. I think the proper argument is he bought the piano and the money for 15.00. I haven't sold it yet. LOL.
Your most likely not going to win though. You are up against the leanest, most aggressive money spending machine on the planet which can make up its own rules as it goes, and pretty much does what it needs to perpetuate.
Kevin