You repeatedly seem to have a problem with my reference to American Litho's use of
19" track width presses. I have presented this theory for the past 7 years on this
forum.
So, I want you to tell us......why you have not questioned Steve B when he speaks of the same 19" track width presses used by ALC to print these cards ?
Furthermore, I will remind you that it was Steve who informed us that ALC most likely printed a lot of their stuff on the standard size
19" x 24" cardboard stock.
Again, I ask you to tell us......why you have not questioned Steve about his information ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
Lots of interesting stuff here as usual.
I'm still learning things about printing in the 1910 era, as well as what practices might have been followed at ALC.
So here's a bunch of info and opinions some old, some new.
The Goodwin sheet really can't be applied to T206. It's not printed, but is a photographic sheet of OJs applied to a backing similar to a cabinet photo. So it actually doesn't have a border, and isn't printed.
T206 fronts are more than 6 colors. More like 8 for many of them.
The work Chris has done breaking down the smaller groups within the overall series is excellent. I'm not really in the "34" camp, but have worked with his breakdown of the 460s, comparing it to available pop reports (which are admittedly flawed, but the best hard data we have right now) and his groups held up very well. Maybe one or two subjects that could be moved between groups, but not provably.
I've now seen a picture of a 1910 era press in operation, and producing a sheet that's about half as wide as the press track!
The 19" width comes from -If I remember it correctly- a floorplan in an article on ALC running their plant electrically. That floorplan specified Hoe #5 presses which were that size.
ALC being huge would have had a wide variety of presses available.
Steve B
|
Clayton......at least Steve and I have provided some meaningful information based on our research to support my theory of 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, or 108-card sheets using
a 19" press to print these cards on sheets whose size varies up to 19" x 24".
Furthermore, the structures of the various Series in the T206 set mathematically lend themselves to factors of
6 and
12. I have not wavered from my thinking regarding
this since the early 1980's when I first started collecting T206's and T205's.
On the other hand, you are "stuck" on the "34 card" sheet myth. And, anyone who challenges that myth "bugs" you.
Anyhow, I have an idea why you repeatedly question my comments on this subject in the past (and here in this thread). But, not when Steve B. talks about 19" presses
and sheet sizes of 19" x 24".
But, for now I'll keep my suspicion on this to myself.
TED Z