Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
Earlier in this thread you appear to be in agreement with someone's suggestion of printing a "34-card" format the "long way" on a 19" x 24" sheet of cardboard.
I agree that this is not good practice....but more significantly, it is mathematically impossible to print a complete sheet of 34 cards on this sheet in this manner.
When you do the math (17 x 1 7/16" = 24 7/16") it exceeds the length of the 24" cardboard sheet.
TED Z
|
I think this post just made me realize why I'm coming up with so many questions for you Ted. You are making your theory fit this 19"x24" cardboard sheet and the 19" track width to the point of blocking out any other possibilities-which stifles the discussion. Let's be open minded here, as none of us were around then and we honestly are not sure of the exact sheet size or the exact press size. You may be exactly right.......but you also may be totally wrong. You also may be partially right and partially wrong. I find your placing of subjects on a sheet more compelling WITHOUT trying to factor in this cardboard sheet size and track width.
I understand you said this was considered a "smaller job" but without business records, invoices, etc. this is (in my opinion) an assumption. We know they ran larger presses- it's not hard for me to imagine that they would print sheets on a press that would take a "slightly" larger sheet-just sayin'
Sincerely, Clayton