[drcy]

He's got to back up his contention with facts, rather than an off the cuff impression. Especially in the light that the Aderondack brand clearly is an old brand of paper. I'm just guessing that he thought the paper looked modern due to the watermark, but, as I said earlier, watermarks have been in paper for centuries.

Maybe he's a paper historian, I don't know. But, then, he'd have the facts and dates to back up his contention.

For the record, I'm no expert on Ruth autographs and have no opinion on the authenticity beyond that I know Scott and Richard know Ruth autographs.