View Single Post
  #148  
Old 12-08-2013, 08:54 AM
nsaddict's Avatar
nsaddict nsaddict is offline
Richard L.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 422
Default

Couldn't disagree more than post #144, especially.........

"Fourth, I absolutely do NOT agree that the buyer had any obligation to ask for a better deception or larger scan."

If you're spending your hard earned money you should take 2 minutes to send an email to address your concerns period! If the cards were raw and the defects not mentioned I would agree. Whether an auction house,ebay or the b/s/t here, the buyer should be a bit more vigilant and ask any questions prior to sealing the deal. Since they were the lowest numerical grade by SGC (the board's majority choice) he got exactly what he paid for. I'm not defending Legendary in any way but I feel this is somewhat of a frivolous post to begin with. So now I'm curious, will David bid with them in the future?
__________________
Rich@rd Lap@int
Reply With Quote