Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Klein
You know I enjoy a good thread like this every day of the week but if the cards are SGC 10's you know something is up with them.
Yes the scans should be bigger but you felt comfortable at your price level and since you knew they were 10's, you could have figured out (You are a smart man) that something else was wrong with them.
Could you post the cards with the updated scans so we can all see what you are talking about. Otherwise there is no visual evidence
Rich
|
Rich, I'll post scans when I list them to sell. As to the "visual evidence", either you believe my story or you believe that I am stirring up a sh*t storm to besmirch someone's good name for no apparent reason. I'll let you decide where the truth lies, and I will feel comfortable with your conclusion either way.
To your main points, did you even look at the scans? I provided a direct link to the lot on the very first post. Based on their appearances, did they look too good to be 1's? And lastly, are you now introducing intelligence as a factor for disclosure? If so, how un-smart would a person need to be to place some responsibility at the feet of the seller?