Thread: pwcc (part two)
View Single Post
  #130  
Old 10-25-2013, 10:49 PM
cyseymour's Avatar
cyseymour cyseymour is offline
Ja,mie B.
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
the notion that if someone is not the subject of a criminal proceeding they did not commit fraud is demonstrably false and patently absurd.
Never wrote that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
Conversely, the mere fact that someone is investigated or even indicted does not mean they committed fraud. An indictment is an allegation, nothing more.
I confused the words indictment and conviction. Meant to say convicted.

Jeff says he is guilty and ought to be prosecuted. I never said Brent was innocent, just that he shouldn't be prosecuted. If law enforcement chooses not to prosecute Brent, then obviously they agree with me and disagree with Jeff. If Brent is prosecuted and found innocent, then he still shouldn't have been prosecuted as he will have been exonerated. So for Jeff to be correct, Brent needs to be both prosecuted and convicted.
Reply With Quote