
09-05-2013, 02:09 PM
|
 |
Ke.n Su.lik
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
Michael, if I had to give a definitive answer, no hedging, I would say 'good'.
I'm no Ruth expert, but I also have avoided giving definitive thoughts on Ruth autographs, so there goes nothing.
It would also not surprise me if you showed a photo of the entire ball, and it had a stamp with Selig's name. There are a lot of good Ruth forgers out there, which is why I don't trust any Ruth autographs without 'provenance'.
|
I think Scott read my mind with this reply!
|