View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-12-2013, 09:28 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 8,112
Default

I think you did a yeoman's job with your list. My sets really run through the 60's and 70's and it seems you have them pretty much ranked wisely. Of course, anything after 1973 can be listed and relisted a whole bunch of different ways, but they all just kinda get grouped together in the 'easy' category.

Overall, a nice 1966 set is probably much harder to achieve than the 1963 set...but then there's that damn high number Rose rookie. Oof! The entire 60's decade in general (save 1965, 68 & 69) is a slave to the high numbers.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote