Jay, thanks for sharing. It is good to see that they were meticulous. As you know, I have my criticisms of certain organizational decisions that they made (and how some of those decisions have played out among grading companies, collectors, etc.) If you read what I wrote above in post #22 among other posts you'll see that I am among those who believe the OJ set is really multiple different sets. I may not agree with how the CSGB laid things out but it is very interesting to see their work and still wish it were accessible to every collector (maybe even published in the revised OJ book?). Thanks again for sharing...
|