Quote:
Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie
To me, it's easier to say, " I have Dorgan, 132-9", than to say, "I have a Dorgan fielding, you know the one where his knees are bent, and his right leg is further back than his left leg, and both his hands are cupped, and he is looking down. You know? That one."
I don't think we have compiled enough information on the set to start excluding previous information. I think more people should collect and write articles and start threads and write books about n172 and n173. It's an interesting set to collect and discuss.
|
Wouldn't you just say, "I have Dorgan, 0327", which is the actual number on the card? And when would you even be saying all these numbers anyways, when virtually everything is communicated via scans on internet auction websites? Has ever an auction occurred where a bidder didn't know what a card was because the auctioneer neglected to put the CSGB catalog number in the description?