Quote:
Originally Posted by ullmandds
I thought they were just pasted in the book and you could see the back through the paper?!
|
Hmmmm, could be. It looked like you could see the indentations on the reverse from the embossing, as if they were looking at the actual card backs. I see what you're saying, though, as it could be a thinner, semi-transparent paper.
whoops, nevermind, just saw what Chris posted (thanks, btw, C)
Quote:
|
Burdick photocopied the backs of cards that had vital information and mounted them on facing pages.
|