05-03-2013, 02:30 PM
|
 |
Dan Bretta
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,134
|
|
[QUOTE=shelly;1126289]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
I think it's worse than that, and it's the crux of why we have so many fights on this forum - it's true that forgers are passing a very high % of bad Ruths and Gehrigs (etc.) right by the two legitimate TPA's, but what's worse is that when we bring these up for discussion on this forum, where we have experts who are better than those that the TPA's use, some of our guys give the bad autographs the green light  And because of the massive egos, disagreement=fight.
Take that '700 HR' Ruth ticket - many say it's good, many say it's not. But the same guy who started off by saying he's 100% positive it's bad, is the only expert (maybe there are two - also a non-board member?) here who thinks the green-ink '27 Yankees ball is good. It's really mind-boggling how much disagreement there is right here.[/QUO
Right or wrong that was his opinion.
I like the new authenticators. The consigner. I am not in the business but it is real the end. |
When someone says it's "100% bad" is that still an opinion?
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
|