Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
Hey Leon,
I agree, he misrepresented the item. I was just making an observation that I felt it was more from his ignorance than any any intentional act to try and make more money off the card and incorrect back. In all honesty, I have not gone back to read his new description. It sounds like he still isn't correctly describing what he is selling.....plus, that is one fugly looking silk with that back included. He would be best off to just get rid of the back and sell the Cobb silk solo. Actually not too bad of a silk, sans the incorrect back.
Bob
|
His new description is that he took out the correction that made it a legit description. He changed it to the original which was misrepresenting it. So he is back to being fraudulent. And I agree, not a bad silk otherwise
.