Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb
I know, Adam, every time I post something on Net 54 involving a controversial topic, you always take the con side to my point of view. I don't even mean 99% of the time but instead, 100%. At this point, I have to think that it is something personal that you have against me (don't know what or why). It's too bad, I used to have a lot of respect for you, especially your knowledge about baseball exhibit cards of the '20's & '30's.
I know more than a little bit about Negro League Baseball material and would not make a definitive statement if I was unsure about an item.
|
Gee Phil, that came out of nowhere...I think I've agreed with you on any number of things over the years. If I don't agree with you it isn't because I don't like you--I don't think we've even met more than once or twice--it is because I disagree with what you are saying. Perhaps if you weren't wrong every single time about everything you ever say on every subject
No one is debating your knowledge on NL items, but I don't think you can write off an item you've never seen without seeing it. That is all I was trying to point out. I am amazed all the time at how little I really know about the items that I am really, really expert about. I find new stuff all the time, which is one reason I enjoy this hobby. If you are 100% certain about the items being fakes, please explain how and why you reach that conclusion. Have you seen them before?