I hesitate to get involved in these mud-slinging contests, but when it comes to actually collecting autographs, how an item presents is very important, similar to what centering and corner condition mean to a card collector.
Personally, I don't want atypical signatures in my collection. Generally I don't like "rushed" signatures either.
Certainly there are cases where rarity supersedes what a signature looks like if you are say, filling a hole in team collection or something like that.
But in the case of Ruth, his autograph can be considered common, if expensive. If you have the money, you can pretty much buy one any day of the week.
I wouldn't want that ball in my collection at any price regardless of the TPA paperwork included.
|