I read the brief the prosecution filed in support of its sentencing recommendation. For anyone interested, here it is:
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ite...stro-plea-deal
The brief notes that in many instances Mastro 'won' the lot and returned it to inventory of either Mastro Auctions or himself [I assume for the items he owned personally]. What was not clear to me is how those results were analyzed. To me, as a reporter of auction outcomes in my boxing price guide, I see a completely fake sale as more damaging to the hobby as a whole than shilling up a real bidder since it sets a fake price point for an item.