View Single Post
  #10  
Old 04-06-2013, 01:10 PM
OTWCards's Avatar
OTWCards OTWCards is offline
$c0tt A1p@ug.h
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 58
Default Answer to Craig M:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig M View Post
Scott,

"Senior grader for SGC (1998-2000)".

What a great opportunity to ask you a couple of questions:

1) What is your point of view on re-slabbing?

2) To prevent re-slabbing in the future (throwing off pop reports); do you anticipate the grading companies to insert an invisible to naked eye (red dye trace) so that when a card comes in to be graded; it will be seen that it has been graded before and therefore rejected back to owner?

Regards,

Craig
Craig:

To address your questions, and this is my opinion only (MOO):

1. It has become a necessary evil. The arbitrary aspect and inconsistency that exists in TPG affords too much loss/gain by not cracking and resubbing "undergraded" examples.

2. I do not anticipate any TPG making any effort to identify or discourage resubbing or reslabbing of the same card. It is both a profit center and the nature of the beast and it appears the groundrules are pretty much established in that respect.
__________________
MOO,
Scott

Collecting: 1948 Leaf Football Master Set (PSA 7 or better - PSA 6 or better for High Numbers), 1948 Leaf Football White Backgrounds, 1948 Leaf Football On-card Autographs, Wire Photos or Original Photos depicting images used for the 1948 Leaf Football issue -- circa 1880-1909 Football cabinets

Last edited by OTWCards; 04-06-2013 at 01:11 PM. Reason: Correction of spelling error
Reply With Quote