I think it's a craps shoot with either. The only reason it may seem like PSA screws up more is due to the fact that they DO screw up "more", but, I would surmise that this is not in an increased percentage of screw-ups, but only in quantity. PSA palpably grades many more cards than SGC...
My guess is that on that Rudolph there is very slight paper loss on the back that is sometimes determined as paper loss, and other times viewed as normal wear. Or, there was an erased pencil mark?
.
__________________
.
Looking for: T205 Cubs in AB, Cycle, Sov, HLC. & E91A Cubs, T206 Cubs master set, T3 Cubs
Last edited by npa589; 04-02-2013 at 12:41 PM.
|