Jim's response was rhetorically ambiguous. He may have implied, but never said it was fake.
I'm not criticizing Jim at all, just saying I could see how the original poster might not have realized he was getting a Yes or No answer. In fact, I first read it to mean that Jim thought the authenticity could reasonably be debated.
Last edited by drc; 03-21-2013 at 07:18 PM.
|