Quote:
Originally Posted by Directly
Again for the Record--Why these Facts adds up positive my baseball player is Charles Comiskey than not!---
1) My photograph was taken in Dubuque.
2) My 1879 photograph was taken during the same time frame Comiskey lived and was playing baseball in Dubuque.
3) Comiskey eight years later ask Dubuque photographer Jordan to take his St Louis team photo, so Comiskey knew the photographer.
4) My Dubuque photograph ended up in St Louis, where several of the baseball players ended up.
5) My baseball Player strongly resembles Comiskey, what's the odds there was another teenager in Dubuque resembling Comiskey during the same time frame, not even calculating the astronomical probability of this Comiskey twin being in a baseball team photo--WOW---do the math on those odds?
6) What's the odds other players in my Dubuque photograph resemble players whom moved over to Dubuque from Peoria, Illinois in 1879?
7) My Dubuque Comiskey photograph is possibly the only in existence. Probably nine or less were produced. Hence the extreme rarity.
Thanks again NET54 forum to established the facts.
--Until and have a wonderful day!
|
Fact: It was shown in post #3 that Comiskey is
NOT in your photo, and could not possibly be the individual you had identified as him.
The rest of your "facts" are extrapolations and suppositions based on your original flawed identification of Comiskey in your photograph. It's all fruit of the poisonous tree so to speak, and the more you try to force the rest of the team into your photo, the more ridiculous you have made yourself look.