Quote:
Originally Posted by teetwoohsix
Ted-
I see. So you're saying there's no double (two different names) cards of THESE cards you've posted as a simulated sheet above.
Here's Jantz's thread I believe you are referencing (awesome thread BTW Jantz): http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...6%2C+two+names
But, here's where I'm confused: Confirmed cards with two different names~ all of these are Piedmont 150:
Bradley-Bender
Killian (pitching)-Chance
Lindaman-Bresnahan
Spade-Cicotte
Lundgren(Cubs)-Doolin
Bender(port)-Delahanty(Wash)
M.Brown(port)-Magee
All of the above cards are from Print Group 1:
http://t206resource.com/Print%20Grou...Checklist.html
I know you are going to say these are not ONLY 150 subjects~ but they are 150 subjects. So, I'm not following still.....
As far as the Wagner strip,,,,so you don't think they printed a sheet out and cut the strip from that? I'm not saying it was a regular production sheet, but just figuring it would be printed on a sheet "the size" of a regular production sheet. I'm trying to follow the 19 inch wide track thing, and understand how if they didn't use the regular presses to do this strip, what did they use?
Sincerely, Clayton |
Now for the Wagner strip answer.
The transfers that would be used to lay out the plates and probably any proofs would have been printed on small manually operated proofing presses.
Those can be very small, tabletop size. And are designed to produce one print at a time. The proofs are examined for both design, and to see if all the color elements are in the right place. An example of something that should have been caught in proofing is Magie, and Doyle. There are others that simply weren't fixed until much later. Ganzel has part of the background extending into his hat. That was fixed, but isn't at all rare. But it should have been caught in proofing.
If the Wagner strip was specially printed to try to convince him, it could have been laid out and one copy made. Or they could have used an existing set of proofs. The registration is very precise, better than some other proofs. In looking at the scans I have yesterday it also occured to me that it has a background color making the borders tan rather than white.
Steve B