Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
Clayton
Realize that the 12 cards I have posted in that 108-card simulated sheet are 150-only subjects. As best we know, this series of T206's were the first printed T206's
in the set. And, were not intermixed with 150/350 series, or 350 series, or 460 series cards.
Therefore, if my 108-card simulated sheet is valid, if any of these 12 - 150-only cards are found with 2 names....I expect that they will be the "same-name" version.
I have never seen any of these cards with 2 different names. I will be very surprised if any of them show up with 2 different names.
Check out Jantz's excellent thread....I welcome you to prove me wrong.
In my opinion, that 5-card Wagner strip was not cut from a regular production sheet. I say this because the two following reasons......
1....The colors on the various cards are incomplete, although the Wagner looks like its colors are all there. Furthermore, the captions are in BLACK ink, rather than the
normal BROWN ink.
2....Wagner is a 150-only subject....the other cards on this strip (M.Brown, Bowerman, CYoung, and Kling) are 150/350 subjects.
TED Z
|
Ted-
I see. So you're saying there's no double (two different names) cards of THESE cards you've posted as a simulated sheet above.
Here's Jantz's thread I believe you are referencing (awesome thread BTW Jantz):
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...6%2C+two+names
But, here's where I'm confused: Confirmed cards with two different names~ all of these are Piedmont 150:
Bradley-Bender
Killian (pitching)-Chance
Lindaman-Bresnahan
Spade-Cicotte
Lundgren(Cubs)-Doolin
Bender(port)-Delahanty(Wash)
M.Brown(port)-Magee
All of the above cards are from Print Group 1:
http://t206resource.com/Print%20Grou...Checklist.html
I know you are going to say these are not ONLY 150 subjects~ but they are 150 subjects. So, I'm not following still.....
As far as the Wagner strip,,,,so you don't think they printed a sheet out and cut the strip from that? I'm not saying it was a regular production sheet, but just figuring it would be printed on a sheet "the size" of a regular production sheet. I'm trying to follow the 19 inch wide track thing, and understand how if they didn't use the regular presses to do this strip, what did they use?
Sincerely, Clayton