Quote:
Originally Posted by teetwoohsix
Well, I don't know about that example of a sheet configuration Ted, you have the same player all the way down the sheet. How would you explain the 1 card 2 name thing? Different name at the top of the card than the name of the player depicted on the card. Like the ones Erick is collecting.
Sincerely, Clayton
|
Clayton
Realize that the 12 cards I have posted in that 108-card simulated sheet are
150-only subjects. As best we know, this series of T206's were the first printed T206's
in the set. And, were not intermixed with 150/350 series, or 350 series, or 460 series cards.
Therefore, if my 108-card simulated sheet is valid, if any of these 12 - 150-only cards are found with 2 names....I expect that they will be the "same-name" version.
I have never seen any of these cards with 2 different names. I will be very surprised if any of them show up with 2 different names.
Check out Jantz's excellent thread....I welcome you to prove me wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teetwoohsix
On a side note- could the Wagner strip show where he may have been on the sheet? It seems to me that (possibly) the ATC would have just cut that strip from a sheet, rather than print a strip? It seems logical to print the sheet, and cut the sample strip right from the sheet. What do you guys think?
Sincerely, Clayton
|
In my opinion, that 5-card Wagner strip was not cut from a regular production sheet. I say this because the two following reasons......
1....The colors on the various cards are incomplete, although the Wagner looks like its colors are all there. Furthermore, the captions are in BLACK ink, rather than the
normal BROWN ink.
2....Wagner is a 150-only subject....the other cards on this strip (M.Brown, Bowerman, CYoung, and Kling) are 150/350 subjects.
TED Z