Thread: Finally, a description that is short, sweet and correct
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 12-30-2012, 07:44 PM
RCMcKenzie's Avatar
RCMcKenzie RCMcKenzie is offline
Rob
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 3,036
Default very poor
I think we need qualifiers below sgc 10 poor these days, as sgc 10 cards are what I used to call g+.

We could have poor, near poor, very poor, awful etc.
Reply With Quote