Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
No, it is not. The first question has to do specifically with a stun gun. I answered it. You then put words in my mouth, re-stating your question to involve apprehension that might or might not involve a stun gun. As I said before, I know almost nothing about stun guns and don't want to get into the gun debate further. I responded to your additional questions out of politeness, but I'm really not interested in going off on a tangent involving a straw man that I am not. I'm through responding to this line of discussion, as it's getting ludicrous.
"If their ultimate goal is to commit suicide, then wouldn't the strong possibility of being disabled and apprehended using a stun gun, be more of a deterrent."
"You're telling me, that if there's a good chance that they'll be apprehended before being able to kill themselves, that they'd still do it anyways?"
|
Like I said, we were obviously on different pages. The original statement was perhaps less specific, due to implied connection with previous statements. You're original answer was perfectly appropriate without being taken in that context.