View Single Post
  #2  
Old 10-29-2012, 03:47 PM
grundle20's Avatar
grundle20 grundle20 is offline
Justin Cur.ze
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 64
Default

Well, speaking from the point of the guy who asked, was offered and was reneged on the deal:

There's actually not even an argument if it's unethical or not. If this were to go to arbitration or court (clearly, I'm not suing anyone, that's ridiculous, this is just to stress the point), I'd win the argument. It constitutes a written offer made and accepted. It's actually not legal BASED on ethics. The whole reason I posted it on a public board was specifically BECAUSE it was unethical, and I thought others should know what it's like dealing with Memory Lane if they have / are considering doing business with them in the future. Also, the very nature of consignment means that Memory Lane had the license to offer at a certain price. Even if the consignor changes his mind, it's AT LEAST Memory Lane's obligation to tell me the offer has expired. You cannot argue that one day to make that decision is too long.

Additionally, after reading in those links I posted on Page 2 of this thread that JP loved to play $50,000 hands of Pai-Gow Poker with money he stole from people who thought their money was going to charity, I felt compelled to post that, too. I invite anyone to speak who thinks those events have NO correlation...

Last edited by grundle20; 10-29-2012 at 03:51 PM.
Reply With Quote