they have exemplar brain freeze.
Here is an scp auction of a joe choynski autograph.
http://catalog.scpauctions.com/LotDe...spx?lotid=8717
It gives a full loa from PSA. It was from 2007 when they don't think anyone is going to question if they actually have exemplars or not.
recently a couple of Choynski autographs went off at heritage, but psa and jsa declined to rule because of lack of exemplars. Now people are questioning them so they bail on their claim that they actually have Choynski exemplars.
http://sports.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=7065&lotNo=81202
http://sports.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=7065&lotNo=82803
So how did the SCP Choynski autograph previoously get a PSA cert, (which the loa list that it was compared to exemplars), if it doesnt seem to have any choynski exemplars this time when these items were listed at heritage?
Seems like they are getting challenged and caught and didnt opine this time, but previously felt they could opine with exemplars that they didnt have? Notice they didn't even use the SCP Choynski autograph, which they claimed had exemplars to back that one up, as an exemplar for the two at heritage. Now they have no exemplars.
This is the big problem in the hobby. they try to get away with what they think they can get away with and they believe people are NOT paying attention.
So my question to PSA - Do you have Choynski autograph exemplars or not?
if not, what do you say to the person who bought the choynski autograph at SCP and proudly displays the psa cert that says it matches known exemplars? Are you recallibg the SCP Choynski cert and refunding the buyer?
In any other business in America, we all know what this represents.
This and the Sayers and others are a big BOXING FAIL!!!!!