Quote:
Originally Posted by jgmp123
I just had a great conversation with Larry Rosenbaum at EAC Gallery and here is what he said...
Anytime they list an item that has been professionally restored, they mention that in the listing....He said that he is not sure why this particular listing omitted that and that the buyer was contacted and a credit/refund was issued because obviously it wouldn't have sold for that amount if it had stated "restored".
He also stated that there specialty is historic documents, not sports and that they bring in an authenticator like PSA or JSA to tell handle the authenticity of the item....
As far as the "provenance" or previous LOA for the item, he did not have any info on that as, he stated, it happened almost 7 years ago.
|
there is no such thing as a restored autograph. because it happened 7 years ago is no excuse not to figure out what happened with the provenance.
if restored autographs in sports is acceptable, then there is a lot of "restored" autograph for sale all over the place, it's called no good.
a big question is how it was restored, does eac know how because it is scary to think how many more autographs out there are "restored" like that?
how can it be listed as the finest truman signed ball extant, if it isn't trumans signature, but "restored"
I am not buying that restored excuse. there is no such thing as a restored autograph. no fault of yours james, thanks for getting the explanation.
If eac knew it was "restored" they should have rejected the signed ball at the least and contacting authorities wouldn't have been out of the question. to say that they specialize in historical items is a cop out. Reznikoff knows darn well that "restored" sports autographs is something that doesn't exist. This stinks.