do we see the duality here?
on one hand, a lot of people are saying that everyone knew it was trimmed all these years, so what is the big deal about.
on the other hand, when people here call it trimmed, then others want to hold off calling it trimmed for sure until the principal of the criminal case confirms it at trial, and on audio tape?
see how important it is to find out once and for all, so this jeckyll and hyde situation can be resolved.
its obviously trimmed to some for certain debate purposes, and it cant be called trimmed to others for other debate purposes.
Last edited by travrosty; 07-30-2012 at 04:35 PM.
|