[markf31]

I know it was in jest.

Those examples aren’t really relevant to this argument. Here's a real life situation comparing more apples to apples as far as circumstances and level of service go. You have x-rays taken and sent to a specialist doctor. The specialist doctor examines the x-rays. The doctors says he'd like to see you in person for a more thorough and complete examination, to make some determinations he maybe can’t quite make just by looking at the x-ray. Guess what, he will be charging you for the x-ray evaluation, and additionally he will be charging you more for an in person office examination and visit. Do you expect the doctor to not charge you for the x-ray evaluation? Or do you expect him to discount the office visit because he already charged you for the x-ray evaluation? What if the doctor saw nothing wrong in the x-ray, but determines that you infact suffered a ligament strain or damage, something he determined with the office visit but was unable to determine in the x-ray? Do you expect him to offer you a partial refund because his first opinion was inaccurate?